- Project teams deliver projects at the expense of relationships when the pressure to deliver builds up
- Leaders don’t recognize when relationships have deteriorated to where a project is about to fail
------------------------
- Continuous monitoring of project team relationship quality compared with a self-assessment of project success
- Improvements in project outcomes and project team relationships
|
- Identifying trends in Project Success Probability (PSP) and Meeting Quality Score (MQS) over the course of a project
- Enabling Project leaders to take pre-emptive actions to protect project benefits
- Empowering project teams to self-correct when they become aware of the build-up of internal or external pressure
|
- At each Project Team meeting, members assess:
- Meeting Quality Score (MQS)
(combination of meeting satisfaction level and overall Meeting Promoter Score (MPS) for that meeting)
- Project Success Probability (PSP)
(estimate of the project’s ultimate success)
- The Project Team Health Graph plots the ongoing assessment of PSP against the corresponding assessment of MQS over the course of the project
- In the sample Team Health Graph (above), over the course of 5 months of Project Team meetings, the PSP is holding steady
[dark blue line] while the MQS is declining
- This trend of declining MQS could indicate that this Project Team might be burning itself out in order to deliver a project on time or to budget
|