mq logo blue
MeetingQuality Project Success Family: Working Group Meeting Use Case
Use Case: How MeetingQuality is deployed within a Working Group

This page illustrates the steps a Working Group would follow from issuing meeting invitations, to receiving and submitting the assessments, to receiving and utilizing the metrics and reports.

1. Working Group adds one additional email address to the group’s meeting invitation (workinggroup@meetingquality.com)

2. As meeting begins, Working Group members receive an
email with a 5-question assessment

 

3. When meeting ends, attendees complete their meeting assessments (taking 45 seconds or less)

4. MeetingQuality’s secure server aggregates the results using proprietary and Social Network Analysis algorithms and applies Artificial Intelligence (IBM Watson) to the action items

 

5. 24 hours after meeting ends, Working Group members are emailed these metrics / reports…

Meeting Promotor Score (MPS)
(peer-rated quality of contribution)
Individual Scores
(Project Success Probability (PSP) versus Project Vision)
Comparative History
Project Success Probability (PSP) vs.
Vision vs. MeetingQuality Score (MQS)
Action Items / Feedback
(reported anonymously) (author name un-traceable)
  • Marie posed many very challenging and probing questions that Fred answered thoroughly.
  • Due to network problems at startup, we lost 15 minutes, but recovered nicely.
  • Marie will follow up with Fred on Thursday to discuss next steps.
  • There were 3 change issues that we did not have time to review.
  • Fred, we need to arrange for a time to catch-up on these 3 issues?
  • AI: Joy 73% Confident 67%
 

6. Working Group incorporates the discussion & review of metrics and reports into ongoing meetings as part of the development methodology used. MeetingQuality Consulting Partners provide management advisory services by interpreting the results and turning them into real-world solutions…

 

7. Periodically, PMO and/or MQ Sponsors are emailed other metrics / reports – such as…

Project Success Probability (PSP) vs. Meeting Quality Score (MQS)
Note divergence  [blue ellipse] as PSP [red line] trends downward while MQS trends upward

Governance Graph
Graph shows the trending of Working Group’s governance assessments over time

Program Results Table
This table shows the comparative results of this Working Group’s Program assessments over seven meetings
Governance Table
This table shows the comparative results of this Working Group’s governance assessments over three meetings